Academic Journals vs. free information
Simon McGarr of tuppenceworth.ie sends in this interesting tidbit:
Academic journals are a shell game. You have to publish in them if you want to be believed or promoted as a researcher. And every large library must subscribe to them if it is to take its job seriously.
But the fees for these subscriptions are astronomical, and rising. Hence the new Free access to information sources such as the Public Library of Science.
In the face of being eaten by the internet, it seems the old publishers have decided to introduce old fashioned bluster to the mix.
Now, Nature has learned, a group of big scientific publishers has hired the pit bull to take on the free-information movement, which campaigns for scientific results to be made freely available. Some traditional journals, which depend on subscription charges, say that open-access journals and public databases of scientific papers such as the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) PubMed Central, threaten their livelihoods.
Information wants to be free, it’ll eventually route around bureaucracy just as it routes around censorship.
2 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




Yay, Lara Croft in Ireland!
Feshti's back and this time he's counting down the top 10 movie opening scenes of all time.
Is American opinion and culture crowding out all others?
Not only must every library subscribe, they must also sign up for increasing numbers of online databases and resources, and guess what, the price of all these is increasing too.
Comment by Fence — January 26, 2007 @ 1:40 pm
I remember when I worked in one of the larger academic libraries in a lowly capacity, that the price of JSTOR and such was staggering.
Comment by Simon McGarr — January 26, 2007 @ 6:01 pm