<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Technological Singularity and The Ultimate Fate of the Universe</title>
	<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/</link>
	<description>An Irish Community weblog about everything</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: letmooout</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-273919</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-273919</guid>
					<description>thats a pretty negative way of looking at it, although i suppose some kind of perpetual recursive loop could well be possible...especially as people fuse more and more with soft/hardware. but its about balance,  an opposite aposite (oh trendy words!) would be: theres a more positive way of looking at it, i suppose some kind of finite recursive loop is possible....especially as people fuse less and less with their original biology. 
i just read this and im not sure what my point is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a pretty negative way of looking at it, although i suppose some kind of perpetual recursive loop could well be possible&#8230;especially as people fuse more and more with soft/hardware. but its about balance,  an opposite aposite (oh trendy words!) would be: theres a more positive way of looking at it, i suppose some kind of finite recursive loop is possible&#8230;.especially as people fuse less and less with their original biology.<br />
i just read this and im not sure what my point is
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: krynn</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-273191</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-273191</guid>
					<description>i suppose it opens up a whole new world for torturers. u could keep the captive alive forever. like infinite guantanamo. u try and pop yourself but you cant. oh man. immortally insane. it reminds me of a song ,' perpetual black second'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suppose it opens up a whole new world for torturers. u could keep the captive alive forever. like infinite guantanamo. u try and pop yourself but you cant. oh man. immortally insane. it reminds me of a song ,&#8217; perpetual black second&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: letmooout</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-266460</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-266460</guid>
					<description>many trees are immortal. they are hundreds of miles wide because they are joined by their root system. a perpetual ecology. cars go on 'forever' if u keep maintaining them. actually, its important to make the distinction between immortal and living indefinetly. immortal means cannot die. i am referring more to living indefinetly. i believe the universe to be immortal and every system within it is lives indefinetly- eg it dies depending on context.  even the moon orbiting the earth will die- the system inevitably wares itself out. people can have this type of perpetual living if they maintain their bodies correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many trees are immortal. they are hundreds of miles wide because they are joined by their root system. a perpetual ecology. cars go on &#8216;forever&#8217; if u keep maintaining them. actually, its important to make the distinction between immortal and living indefinetly. immortal means cannot die. i am referring more to living indefinetly. i believe the universe to be immortal and every system within it is lives indefinetly- eg it dies depending on context.  even the moon orbiting the earth will die- the system inevitably wares itself out. people can have this type of perpetual living if they maintain their bodies correctly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: krynn</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-263723</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-263723</guid>
					<description>ok just explain the immortality, world-wide peace, and faster than light travel in a rational way and and i wont provoke u anymore. just a tad optimistic, no!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok just explain the immortality, world-wide peace, and faster than light travel in a rational way and and i wont provoke u anymore. just a tad optimistic, no!?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: letmooout</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-260502</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-260502</guid>
					<description>thats obviously for provokment. everything and everyone is subservient to a system/pattern/machine/etc, its all the same. art is an attempt to break the mould. anything is art, including not attempting to break the mould. the singularity is an artistic vision, like when man predicted flight, or realised the earth was flat, or spherical. its all one revelation. i think the singularity is a true, artistic revelation. it really is a fantastic idea. like speeding faster than light, perpetual motion for people, immortality, and worldwide peace (with a bit of luck, although i do agree with your cynicism on the peace one), we will get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats obviously for provokment. everything and everyone is subservient to a system/pattern/machine/etc, its all the same. art is an attempt to break the mould. anything is art, including not attempting to break the mould. the singularity is an artistic vision, like when man predicted flight, or realised the earth was flat, or spherical. its all one revelation. i think the singularity is a true, artistic revelation. it really is a fantastic idea. like speeding faster than light, perpetual motion for people, immortality, and worldwide peace (with a bit of luck, although i do agree with your cynicism on the peace one), we will get there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: krynn</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-256149</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-256149</guid>
					<description>a singularity will not occur. i have never come across one genuinely intelligent computer. machines will always be subservient to people who can see beyond, like me. people are only subservient to machines when they are stupid enough to be subservient to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a singularity will not occur. i have never come across one genuinely intelligent computer. machines will always be subservient to people who can see beyond, like me. people are only subservient to machines when they are stupid enough to be subservient to them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: letmooout</title>
		<link>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-255566</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcal.net/archives/2006/12/08/the-technological-singularity-and-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/#comment-255566</guid>
					<description>well i'm hum. GOT to go now but I will be back, i have to build a plague. back 10.15pm approx, jan16 07 as in 2night? its either that or play chess with myself. u better answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i&#8217;m hum. GOT to go now but I will be back, i have to build a plague. back 10.15pm approx, jan16 07 as in 2night? its either that or play chess with myself. u better answer
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
